Categories
Law

The Life And Times of A Senior Advocate of Nigeria.


Being a paper delivered at the July 2021 monthly meeting of the Nigerian Bar Association, Unity branch Abuja by Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, FNCIArb, FNIALS, Life Bencher.

I want to thank the Chairman and Executive Committee of the Unity Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja for the honour of sharing with my colleagues, memories of important events in my legal career of 43 years at the Bar and almost 30 years at the Inner Bar.
As you know everything in one’s life is part of one’s history. We write our history every day and such experiences are either positive or negative but believe me, there can be no success story without its preceding pains, losses and breath taking moments. “No cross no crown” the saying goes.

I want you to remember that who you meet and what you hear from people, especially, if it is the truth, can change the course of your life for the better. The key to topmost heights is humility, obedience and faith that can move mountain. Humility comes before honour.

IN THE BEGINNING WAS GOD

The truth is that God is the designer and the supervisor of my legal career. I graduated with LL.B Hons (Second Class Lower Division) at the University of Ife, Ile-Ife in 1977. I was called to Bar on Friday July 7th 1978 at the Nigerian Law School, Victoria Island, Lagos at about the age of 31 years. It was a great and unforgettable celebration that day, the ceremony was the joy of lawyers called to the Bar, parents and relatives. We were not allowed to take more than one guest into the Lagos Law School dinner hall. Chief G.C.M. Onyuike SAN was the Chairman Body of Benchers and at the top table were Chief F.R.A. Williams SAN, Hon. Justices Bello Sowemimo, Idigbe, Analogu, Fatai Williams, Kayode Esho Justices of the Supreme Court and many other very senior and notable Legal Practitioners.

The joy of the day was so much but I took note of the Chairman’s charge. It deeply impacted on my life and I prayed to God to take me to the highest rank in the legal profession. From that day, I resolved to remain at the Bar, actively practising law in all courts and at all levels.
On Monday 18th August 1978, we reported at the Kwara State NYSC Camp for orientation programmes at Kwara State College of Technology. During the orientation I met an older person called Mr. Ibrahim Kuranga, a ground staff of NYSC Kwara State. He took me as a younger friend, told me about his life and he counseled that, I must, in my career as a Lawyer, be disciplined and prayerful. He told me of many lawyers, he knew, who fell from grace to grass due to inability to discipline their bodies. Through this man, I was approached by the Head of Department of Law, Kwara Polytechnic to teach Criminal Law, Evidence Law and Commercial Law for Diploma in Law classes. I taught many students from 1978 to 1982. I was at his Muslim firdaus in 2010 at Ilorin when he passed on. Today I remember him and forever I will be grateful for the impact his words of wisdom had on my growth in life. This relationship taught me never to look down on any man no matter his status. May God grant him peace forever. I made several friends at the Camp and I enjoyed myself.The Legal Aid Council officials came to the Orientation Camp and gave us one week training on procedure, advocacy and management of legal aid services to inmates in prisons in Ilorin, Lokoja, Okene and New Bussa; Borgu prisons.

DO NOT DESPISE THE DAYS OF THE LITTLE BEGINNINGS
I urge all young Legal Practitioners that in the practice of law everything is not money. Pro bono services are services to God and none is ever lost. Whoever excessively loves money can never have enough and everyman who gained freedom from prison and escaped police brutality through your efforts will never forget.
As a young lawyer, you have the potentiality to become the best and wear the highest rank and stand out among your peers. You must show readiness and pant after good works.
God bless Mallam S.B.A Laaro, the then DPP in the Ministry of Justice, Ilorin. After the Orientation Camp of the NYSC about 10 Legal Practitioners were posted to Kwara State Ministry of Justice. From the first week in the Ministry, I never allowed the DPP to rest until he began to assign case files from the Nigeria Police to me for legal opinion and possible prosecution. I committed myself to not less than 50 files within 2 weeks and most of my opinions were approved by the DPP.
My colleagues made jest at me and they called me names but in the end I was awarded the “Best Corper of the Year” and decorated by the Military Administrator of Kwara State, at the passing out Dinner. My Learned friends, know that as a Junior in chambers, you are not in competition with anybody. You must be yourself and be outstanding in whatever assignment is given to you. Disregard the noise of the market around you. Your success will attract negative reactions and discouraging comments of your peers but remain focused.

After about 6 months in the Ministry of Justice, I was moved to the Legal Aid Council. As a green wig, in the Legal Aid Council I was assigned a murder case, prosecuted by Ministry of Justice Director of Public Prosecution, to defend at the High Court, Ilorin.The knowledge I had in reviewing Police case files in the office of the DPP assisted me greatly, because the experience exposed me to the methods of police investigations. There were always loop holes in the investigation, unfortunately. I lost the case but the woman was not sentenced to death by hanging but found guilty of culpable homicide not punishable with death, subject to prerogative of mercy by the Governor. Do you believe there is power of witchcraft? She was a victim of that belief. The Honourable judge understood the plight of the young woman but the law must take its course. She was guilty and sentenced according to the law.

BE CAREFUL, PEOPLE SEE YOU AND KEEP NOTE OF YOU EVERYDAY
After my youth service, I joined the Law ofiice of Tunji Arosanyin & Co Ilorin in 1979. There was the general election to the office of the Governor of Kwara State and the Legislature. My boss was a big man in National Party of Nigeria (NPN) and so the office was involved in election petitions at the Tribunal, I was exposed to Senior Legal Practitioners like Chief Remi Fani Kayode SAN, Chief Sobo Sowemi SAN, Chief Richard Akinjide SAN and I as one of the junior Counsel for Alhaji Adamu Attah, the NPN Governor-elect. I was charged with daily recording of proceedings, research and drafts of most of the submissions. It was my first challenge and exposure to private practice under a Senior Counsel. Let me reiterate that the heights that these great men of the law reached and kept was not accidental or achieved by sudden flight but through years of hardwork.
They commended my good conduct throughout the hearing at the Tribunal presided over by Honourable Justice Ovie Whiskey who was then the CJ of Bendel State. I learnt so much from these Seniors but I must say it was without pay. (laugh)
I will always remember how they encouraged me and fired me to face my adversary with courage. They were giants at the Bar who had made notable names as we read in Law Reports and famous for political offices they once occupied.
RELATIONSHIP WITH COURTS/COLLEAGUES
I ask you to show utmost respect to the Court-Judge in session. Do not wear wrong uniforms otherwise the Court may not see you.
Do not patronize the Judge, be polite and courteous. Be alert to take hints, from the Bench which most times are helpful.
Don’t attempt any act of familiarity or show that you know the Judge, even if you do. Avoid argumentative traits which may show you as arrogant or disrespectful. They have the law in their bosom from where the Bar draws from.
Do not dress or undress in the face of the Court, it is disrespectful or contempt in the face of the Court. I see this very often in our Courts unfortunately even by Senior lawyers removing their wigs and gown in the open court room.
Avoid harsh and impolite language against the judge or your colleagues whether orally or in writing. As a junior, I was a “radical” but as I grew older at the Bar, I realized that Judges discuss the behavior of Counsel who appeared before them and compare notes. You may be marked down and lose help when you need their discretion.
Do not quarrel with colleagues because of any client. Clients come and go. Your “Learned Friends” are your “best friends”. If anyone insults you, ignore it and don’t be distracted. Annoyance or anger will rob you of success and losing cases drives away potential clients.
Do not share your fees with anybody. If you are lucky to have cases that ought to feature as headlines in the media but did not, for any reason, don’t worry yourself time will soon come when the media gentlemen will look for you.
Avoid undue emotional involvement or entanglement with any client concerning money. In divorce matters, avoid intimacy, particularly, with the women, otherwise your fees may not be paid or your marriage may be affected. It has happened before and may happen to you. Avoid fleshy lust and be professional in dealing with your clients and adversaries.

KEEP USEFUL AND TRUTHFUL FRIENDS; RECOGNIZE TALENTS OF JUNIORS AND REWARD THEM
I have always believed that a good professional friend is an asset. Cultivate the friendship of lawyers whether older than you, your age or junior to you. Chief Charles Akinlolu Olujimi SAN was my confidant and friend from Ife. He met me at Ilorin in 1979 when he came to serve as a Youth Corper. We lived together in a flat.
He was and still till today a man who value and respects his friends, extremely matured but can be too blunt in fact. He and I cultivated the habit of reading at least one judgment per day and update our practice notes; learn from us. We went through All Nigerian Law Reports, West African Court of Appeal Reports, All England Law Report and Nigerian Monthly Law Report and took notes of all decisions. We still continue our reading habit till date. I was lucky that Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN my senior, and I related as brothers and friends. He is a man of excellent character, meticulous and a bold advocate.
In 1983, Mallam Yusuf Ali (now SAN) joined my chambers as a youth Corper and remained with me for about 11 years before he opened his own law office. He became SAN a few years after. He was very loyal and committed to maintaining the Code of ethical Conduct of Awomolo & Co. We NEVER bribed any Judge and I did not receive any complaint about him even when I went to Osun State to be the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice. He was responsible, disciplined and accountable. He is my pride at the inner Bar. Indeed all my juniors, learnt something from me, I can say today some of them are SANs and Judges of Superior Courts.

IMBIBE THE CULTURE OF INTEGRITY AND HONOUR
Clients must trust you and the trust is earned. Your integrity will and should be your selling point. The attitude of clients to appeal in Kwara State then, was to leave all lost cases to God. Counsel compiled records and transmitted same to the Court of Appeal, Kaduna. Wole Olanipekun SAN and few of us like Bayo Ojo SAN, Lawal Rabana SAN, Yusuf Ali SAN, Bayo Adelodun SAN and few others used to drive together from Ilorin to Kaduna for appeals until the Ilorin division of the Court was created. We related as friends even when we had to oppose one another in Court. We ate and drank together as friends.

We accorded highest respect to seniors like Chief D.A. Akintoye, J.O.A. Ijaodola, Chief Tunji Arosanyin, Mr. Faloranmi, J.A. Alhaji Aliu Salmana SAN, Alhaji A.G.F. Abdulrazaq SAN, Mr. David Folusho Babalola (later Hon. Justice). All these were role models that impressed us. It was a great opportunity to cross swords with them in courts. They were always available to help provided the case was not one in which they were interested.

Most of the cases we had were land disputes or chieftaincy cases and most clients found it convenient to pay counsel with land or crops like yam, corn, palm oil etc. I learnt never to turn a client away because he could not pay my fees. You must take the brief first, put in your very best and that will encourage the client to pay his fees as you record successes or refer to you those who can pay. In fact, we were more concerned with cases to engage us or keep us busy. Idleness and lack of work to do is like dying slowly after reading and reading with nowhere to apply it.

BE A MAN OF YOUR OWN MIND
In choosing a path or career in the legal profession, you must know yourself, your capacity and follow a career path that you can optimally utilize to achieve your potentials. You have great potentials and the capacity to beat my record of being elevated to the rank of SAN at 14 years at the Bar. Few younger colleagues have beaten my record though. I assured myself that I needed the covering of a Senior after the NYSC. I am one of those who subscribe to the idea of 5 years tutelage after the call to Bar. It is dangerous and unhelpful to open a law office directly after being called to the Bar. You need the guide of a Senior Lawyer. You need the clout and exposure under a Senior for you to succeed.

WHATEVER YOU SO SOW YOU WILL REAP
In 1992 January Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN was appointed the Attorney General of Ondo State and myself as Attorney General of Osun State. On 7th July 1992 when I was about 14 years at the Bar, I was elevated, preferred and decorated with the rank of Senior of Advocate of Nigeria on 20/07/1992. I did not know any member of the LPPC. I did not even know the date of the meeting but I was told that because I was just 14 at the Bar, I would have had to wait for the following year. I later heard that some members of the Committee pleaded for me. Therefore, be good to all who come across you in practice. It is uncharitable for anyone to plant into your head that you need several millions of Naira to bribe anyone to become a Senior Advocate of Nigeria. It is all lies. I will forever be grateful to Aare Afe Babalola SAN, Hon Justice Kabiri Whyte JSC, Hon. Justice Saidu Kawu JSC, Hon Justice T.A Oyeyepo CJ Kwara State then and Hon Justice Akin Apara the CJ of Osun State then for their contributions to the elevation.

NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION:
AS A LAWYER YOU MUST SUPPORT THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
When I got to Kwara State in 1978, the Bar Association was synonymous with a Senior who had been Chairman for over 10 years. Wole Olanipekun, Bayo Ojo, myself and few other “young radicals” of like minds forced the holding of the Ilorin branch election and we elected young lawyers as Chairman and Exco members. In subsequent elections, we repeated election of young Lawyers as Chairmen and this boosted the public image of the Bar Association. We conducted Law Week Programmes, Seminars and Public Lectures. In 1990 I was elected the Chairman of the branch with a narrow margin of one vote to defeat my opponent.
Since 1987 I have been attending the meetings of the National Executive Committee of the NBA. The membership of the NEC exposed me to active leaders of the Association across Nigeria. I became very familiar with Presidents and big names at the Bar like Chief B.O. Benson SAN, Charles Idehen, Chief R.O.A. Akinjide SAN, Prince Bola Ajibola SAN, Chief Dr. Mudiaga Oje SAN, Mr. Alao Aka Bashorun, Dr. Nwakama Okoro SAN, Chief N.N Anah SAN, Chief Olisa Chukwura SAN, Chief A.N Anyemene SAN, Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim SAN, Chief Philips Umeadi SAN, L. Ladapo SAN, Sir Clement Akpambo SAN, Chief Debo Akande SAN, Chief Anthony Mogboh SAN, Chief A.A Fadairo SAN, Kehinde and Idowu Sofola SAN, Mrs Aderinsola Balogun, Kanmi Ishola Oshobu, Otunba Ajayi Okunnaga SAN, Alfro Fayoku, Mr. J. B Magiyagbe SAN of Kano, Alhaji Ali Kaloma, Alhaji Bashir Dalhatu, Galadima Adamawa, Murtala Aminu, Sir Alfred Eghobamien SAN, Chief Bankole Oki SAN, Chief (Mrs) Priscilla Kuye, Chief T.O.S Benson SAN, Gally Brown Peterside SAN, G.A Graham-Douglas SAN, O.C.J. Okocha SAN, Olisa Agbakoba SAN and many others. Knowing and relating with these respectable members of the Bar helped in building recognition and contacts. You need to know and relate with respectable seniors at the Bar.

MY ROLE MODEL
YOU MUST CHOSE A ROLE MODEL
The wise man says humility comes before honour and only the humble will inherit the world. Learning the law, Practicing the law with integrity and Honour are the best any lawyer must aspire to be. However, your first 5 years of legal practice would determine how far “a green wig” can go. You must choose a role model, a mentor and a respected leader in the profession from whom you will gain inspiration as they will sometimes be available to encourage you at downtimes. There are senior Lawyers who are perceived to be involved in the “infamous conduct” of compromising the Bench, they are known by the juniors. There are some that juniors see as “Janakara Practitioners”. You must avoid them in choosing your role model or mentor. Avoid any confrontation with any senior.

I was lucky to have the privilege of Aare Afe Babalola SAN as my father in the Legal Profession. He was available to give me a shoulder to rest on. He gave me every chance and opportunity to grow in the knowledge of the law. He was a workaholic and dogged advocate. He taught me to be “charitable and kind to everyone around me, be generous and be a giver, a giver never lacks, as you give so you will receive”. So he taught me. I am grateful, Oga. A junior must not expect a rosy beginning. You must trust that tomorrow, notwithstanding what today may appear to be, will be better.
Juniors worry much that they, like Seniors do not enjoy patronage. Everything takes time. You can without offending the Legal Practitioners Act, market yourself in this modern day of social media blow your trumpet. Market yourself by writing articles in legal journals and other media. Chief Tunji Arosanyin gave me the platform and opportunity and I will forever remember because he gave me his office to practice, manage and to cut my legal teeth from 1979-1983.

LIFE AS CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEE OF CHAIRMEN AND SECRETARIES
In 1992, the Nigerian Bar Association at its annual conference held in Port-Harcourt was unable to conclude its election of officers. This was followed by various court orders and counter orders obtained by aggrieved members. The falcon did not hear falconers and all the efforts of the seniors at the Bar failed in resolving the “impasse”. The Federal Military Government under General Sanni Abacha, intervened at the instance of the Body of Benchers with a Decree that dissolved the NBA and gave the Body of Benchers powers to appoint administrators for the NBA.
The NBA members all over the country did not agree to the Decree and at a joint meeting of Ikeja/Yola branches held in Lagos in 1996 to fashion the way forward, the Chairman of Ikeja branch Mr. Ogunniyi nominated me and I was appointed the Chairman of all the 44 branches Chairmen and Secretaries. In that capacity, I travelled across the country and held meetings in almost all the branches between 1996-1998. We thereafter organized the Jos Conference. At the Jos plenary conference, we amended the Constitution of the NBA and limited officers tenure to 2 years only. The members of Sub-Committee, as evidence of our integrity disqualified ourselves from contesting any office. We conducted the election to the office of President and other officers of the NBA. Mr. T.J.O. Okpoko, SAN from Warri branch was elected the new President of the NBA in 1998.

Today I feel happy that the Nigerian Bar Association still exists in Nigeria. There is no need to quarrel or “fight to finish” on NBA elections to serve. In our days, we paid for our transport and received no remuneration for being officers of the NBA. As a legal practitioner, you must be committed to the ideals of the NBA. You must be ready to serve in whatever position you are considered suitable. It does not matter whether you are appreciated or not. Never expect any reward or commendation from anyone.

BEING HUSBAND AND SENIOR OF A LAWYER
It is a divine design of God that my wife became a lawyer. Before she became a lawyer, she annually accompanied me to all Lawyers’ conferences in several locations in Nigeria. She also went with me to all International Bar conferences as our annual vacation. She was a graduate of Chemistry which she taught for about 10 years. She knew all the big names I related with in the legal profession. Perhaps, the exposure to the good life at the Bar was part of the attraction that made her to become a lawyer. In 2013, she became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria. She was my biggest critic and restraint against youthful “shenanigans” at conferences, because she was my “conference material” But suffice it to say that she was and still is a great asset in research and financial discipline. She is my only junior that cannot resign or set up her own law office. Since she knows how hard it is to get money she also checks the reckless spending and “unnecessary or unworthy charities” God was at the beginning. He saw me through all the stages, because he designed it and I am very hopeful he will see me to the end to truly end well. I give Him glory.

Thank you again for the honour to be here to share my professional life with you and I hope you have all learnt one thing or another.
God bless you all.

Asiwaju Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, FNCIArb, FNIALS, Life Bencher.

Culled from The loyal Nigeria lawyer.

Categories
Law

Photo Speaks: Kate Onyinye Omenugha led South East LAWSAN organized its maiden and historic convention tagged “The Invigoration”.

The Law Students’ Association of Nigeria (LAWSAN) South East Directorate of policies, programs, and projects organized its maiden convention of Law students in the zone tagged “The Invigoration”.

The convention which turned out to be the biggest gathering of law students in the southeast zone was held from 29th of July 2021 to 1st of August 2021.

*Day 1: Arrival & Meet/Greet Session *

The arrival of delegates was scheduled for 29th July 2021. On that day, delegates from the various faculties of law across the South East zone converged at the venue of the convention, Golden Tulip Hotel, Agulu in Anambra State.

The delegates received a warm welcome from the officials of the Southeast directorate and registration of the delegates commenced by 1 pm. Delegates were checked into their rooms after the registration process and given a rundown of the activities expected to take place and also a set of rules to abide by during their stay at the convention.

MEET AND GREET
After a successful registration of delegates for the convention, the first program was the meet and greet session for delegates to get acquainted with one another. It was a huge success as the program featured a welcome address by the Zonal Director Onyinye K. Omenugha, AICMC, games, food, music, and fun.
After that, the delegates returned to their various rooms to rest and prepare for the next day.

Day 2: CONFERENCE AND BBQ FESTIVAL

On the 30th day of July 2021, the conference and panel discussion was held at the Golden Tulip Hotel banquet hall. The event had over 8 guest speakers and panelists in attendance to discuss the topic Restoring and building the dignity of the legal profession.
Students were engaged in the best ways to restore the dignity of the legal profession.
During the conference, the first magazine publication of the South East Directorate titled “The Invigoration” magazine was launched. It features articles written by various students of law from different faculties of law in the zone on diverse issues of law. It also features programs that have been organized by the directorate and a special interview with a double first-class holder from the zone Ebube Akpamkpo.

Later that day, the BBQ festival was set up by the poolside of the hotel. This event featured a Food competition, swimming, dance, music, board games, face painting, live performance to thrill the delegates.

Day 3: Sports Day and Grand Dinner

On the 31st of July 2021, delegates were engaged in exercise and sporting activities. The delegates were led by fitness instructor Bisi-Aretola Daniel together with the zonal director Onyinye K. Omenugha AICMC.

There were marathon, relay, and short distance race competitions organized to keep the delegates engaged.

The Grand finale of the convention was the Grand Dinner and award night.
The dinner had the National Vice President Eluma Harriet, the National Director of Policies, Programs and Projects Obinna Udochukwu, the LAWSAN Chief Judge Munir Ishaq Shu’aibu, the LAWSAN Senate President, Sen Emmanuel Williams, and a host of other LAWSAN national leaders in attendance.


The dinner was also graced by the SA to the Anambra state Governor on Legal matters, Mrs. Patricia Igwebike Esq where she delivered a speech on the process of having a successful career in the legal profession.
Later on, awards were presented to deserving winners with the highlight of the occasion being the presentation of the Iconic Leadership award presented to the Zonal Director Onyinye K. Omenugha AICMC by her executives and planning committee members for her overwhelming leadership quality and guidance.

*Day 4: Departure *
On the 1st of August,2021, the delegates that came for the LAWSAN Southeast Zonal convention all safely departed to their various destinations.

It was indeed a beautiful and top-notch convention as all expectations were reached and surpassed by the shining directorate.

SEZC2021

Categories
Law

A COMMENTARY ON THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN JEGEDE V AKEREDOLU VIS-A-VIS MATTERS ARISING.By Mustapha Babalola Toheeb.

A COMMENTARY ON THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN JEGEDE V AKEREDOLU VIS-A-VIS MATTERS ARISING.
By Mustapha Babalola Toheeb.
Recently, the Supreme Court pronounced a judgement in favour of Governor Rotimi Akeredolu in respect of his re-election as governor of Ondo State, which was received with great joy and happiness especially amongst the faithfuls of the rulling party as the apex court decision was a split judgment of four to three. It was just the decision of one Justice that would have turned the tide against him, but he was “lucky” to have escaped the hammer. The Supreme Court, in a split decision of four to three had dismissed the appeal filed by the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Eyitayo Jegede against the election of Governor Rotimi Akeredolu in the Ondo State governorship election.

Due to the fact it was a judgment that involved a Constitutional issue, a panel of seven Justices of the Supreme Court sat over the appeal as against the usual five Justices. While four out of the seven-member panel of justices of the apex court dismissed the appeal, three of the Justices, including the presiding justice, Mary Peter-Odili were of the view that the appeal should be allowed.

In its split judgment of four against three by the seven member-panel, which sat on the Ondo governorship election petition, the Supreme Court had contended that the reason it did not sack Governor Rotimi Akeredolu of the state, was because the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate in the October 10, 2020 election, Eyitayo Jegede, failed to join the National Chairman of the party’s Caretaker Committee and Governor of Yobe State, Mai Mala Buni, even when the issues revolved around him.
As expected, the judgement has attracted a lot of reactions and analyses from legal experts, as there seems to be divided views as regards the position of law on whether Mai Mala Buni, the Governor of Yobe State and the current National Chairman of the Caretaker Committee, APC is allowed to be at the helm of affairs of the Caretaker Committee considering the provisions of Section 183 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) which provides as follows:
“the governor shall not, during the period when he holds office, hold any other executive office or paid employment in any capacity whatsoever.”
However, Article 17 (iv) of the APC constitution is clear and states that no official of the party shall at same time hold any executive position in any government institution.

Now, the above submissions particularly the laws and recent rulling of the Supreme Court has attracted two interpretations or views from legal experts across the country. The first view which was initially voiced by the Minister of State for Labour, Festus Keyamo (SAN), he was of the view that the recent rulling of the Supreme Court in the Jegede v Akeredolu case particularly taking into consideration the provisions of Section 183 of the Constitution is to the effect that Governor Buni cannot hold any other position including the position of the National Chairman of APC Caretaker Committee and that the Supreme Court has just weaponised all those that would be aggrieved by the APC Congresses to proceed to court to Challenge the competence of the Buni-led CECPC to organise the Congresses and National Convention. He further advised the APC to halt all preparations and conduct of congresses nationwide forthwith, having analysed the implications of the judgment.

Apart from Keyamo, Chief Anthony Ajulo SAN, a constitutional lawyer has maintained the same position and according to him,the Nigerian constitution does not permit the same person to hold two executive positions, therefore, he called for the immediate resignation of Buni as the Acting National Chairman of the ruling party.
Chief Ajulo then added, “It is therefore incontrovertible that the continuous stay of the Governor as Chief Executive Officer of the All Progressives Congress runs contrary to the provision of the Constitution and as such may be an albatross on the party, as all he had done before would be null and void, including the nomination of candidates within the period of his so-called Leadership of the party.”

According to the Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Senator Babafemi Ojudu and Senior Special Assistant to the President on Niger Delta Affairs, Senator Ita Enang have also maintained the same position with the above submissions of the learned silks and also joined the call for the Buni committee to be disbanded.

On a final note, Akintayo Balogun, a private legal practitioner has also aligned himself with the first view and also opined that if Buni had been joined as a party in the Jegede v Akeredolu suit, the judgement would have been in favour of Eyitayo Jegede, SAN and PDP, except if the Justices again find another escape route for the Respondents. It would have been another judgment from the Supreme Court and not majority of the electorate.
Furthermore, he was of the view that every activity(s), duty(s), task(s) and responsibility(s) of the Caretaker (interim) Chairman from inception of his duty as caretaker, to the day he hands over to a substantive chairman or to another caretaker chairman, is rendered a nullity and of no effect once “properly” challenged.

The other view which was led by Chief Adeniyi Akintola SAN, one of Akeredolu’s counsels during the election petition was of the opinion that by the pronouncements of the Election Petition Tribunal and the Court of Appeal which was affirmed by the apex court, Governor Buni could combine both party and elective positions and that the minority judgement stating that Buni can’t hold the two positions has no value.
He went on to assert that the provisions of Section183 of the constitution, according to the justices wasn’t violated by Buni. That was the reasoning of the tribunal.The Court of Appeal even affirmed the election petition stance that Section 183 wasn’t breached.

The Learned Silk is not the only one on this path as the Deputy Senate President, Ovie Omo Agege also aligned himself with the second view and furthermore opined that going by the explicit provision of Section 183 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), it is absolutely impossible and untenable to argue that the provisions of Section 183 bars a Governor from being a Chairman or member of a Caretaker Committee set up by his or her political party. Moreso, the position of the Chairman of a Caretaker Committee cannot by any sense of imagination, logic or simple common sense be classified as being a salaried Executive office.

He added that there is no law under our legal jurisprudence that bars or prohibits a Governor who is a member of a political party and won elections under the political party from carrying out specific assignments on behalf of his party. How this will amount to holding an Executive office is beyond every stretch of human comprehension.

On a final note, he opined that Section 183 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) only bars a Governor from holding Executive positions like being a Minister, or any other executive positions for which he shall be paid for. It does not by any scintilla of imagination, render the appointment of Governor Bumi as APC Caretaker Committee Chairman incompetent and will not in any way, affect the legality or competence of the APC scheduled Congresses.

Going by the analyses from both sides, it is imperative that the rulling party need to get it right this time particularly on how to solve this legal conundrum as any wrong decision on the part of the party might threaten the existence of the party. Subsequent court pronouncements and time will tell whether an attempt to continue with Governor Buni on the part of the rulling party would not jeopardize their future or lead to a misfortune which might be worse than what happened to the party in Zamfara few years ago but before then God bless Nigeria.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Mustapha Babalola Toheeb is a Pupil of Law, a content creator, a blogger & a student of Faculty of Law, Bayero University, Kano. He is the Founder of Lex Updates Publications, and the Zonal Director, Directorate of Programs, Policies and Projects, North West Zone, Law Students Association of Nigeria.
He is interested in advocacy, academic writing, legal writing/history, activism and a plethora of positivism. To reach him,email:toheebmustapha15@gmail.com or contact/whatsapp:08106244073.

REFERENCES.

  1. APC IN JEOPARDY OVER BUNI’S CONTINUED STAY
    THE IMPLICATION OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT TODAY IN JEGEDE VS AKEREDOLU AS IT AFFECTS THE APC IS THAT THE PARTY MUST HALT ALL PREPARATIONS AND CONDUCT OF CONGRESSES NATIONWIDE FORTHWITH
    AS NATIONAL CHAIR BY THISDAY NEWSPAPER.
  2. GOVERNOR MAI MALA BUNI AS APC INTERIM CHAIRMAN, A NULLITY ABI INITIO BY AKINTAYO BALOGUN ESQ.
  3. WHY MAI BALA BUNI SHOULD STEP DOWN NOW BY ANTHONY AJULO SAN.
  4. THE IMPLICATION OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT TODAY IN JEGEDE VS AKEREDOLU AS IT AFFECTS THE APC BY FESTUS KEYAMO SAN.
Categories
Law

FARUK ABDULLAHI (SIR MUTUM) EMERGES AS NEW LAWSAN BUK PRESIDENT.

Reporters: Mustapha Babalola Toheeb and Mubarak Adebayo.

In the early hours of today, Abdulahi Faruk popularly known as Sir Mutum was sworn in today as the newly elected President of Law Students Association of Nigeria, BUK Chapter by Justice Munir Ishaq.

The LAWSAN election was conducted few days ago and there was massive turn out which was unexpected considering the political apathy in the faculty for the past few years.

Below are the names of the candidates according to the post they went for.

President:

Abubakar Dauda Shehu (NEPA)
Sen. Faruk Abdullahi (Sir Mutum)

Vice-President Lawsan BUK
Halima Yusuf (Hamlam)
Khadeejah Ibrahim (Smally)

Secretary-General Lawsan BUK
Abdulsamad Muhammad (Senegalese)
Muhammad Sanu Ammar (Ammar)

Assistant Secretary-General Lawsan BUK
Ibrahim Muhammad Usman (Police)
Dan Yazid

Social Director
Sadiqat Musa Abdullah (Boss Madam)
Shamsudeen (Shamo)

Below are the breakdown number of voters according to classes.

Spill Over 1 – Nil
Spill Over 2 – Nil
Level 1 – 94 students
Level 2 – 154 students
Level 3 – 144 students
Level 4 – 145 students
Level 5 – 47 students

Total Number of Voters 584 Students

In Polling Unit 1 – 286 Voters/Students
In Polling Unit 2 – 298 Voters/Students

Total No. of Votes Cast 584 Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 286 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 298 Votes

Total Ballot Papers – 800
Unused Ballot Papers – 213
Used Ballot Papers
Polling Unit 1 – 286
Polling Unit 2 – 298
Total Used – 584

Total ballot papers accounted for 797 while three (3) were not and this may be due to voters who just choose not to vote anymore or destroyed ballot papers due to errors or whatever reason.

Votes as casted for the respective posts:

SOCIAL DIRECTOR:

Sadiqat (Boss Madam)
In Polling Unit 1 – 128 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 133 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 261 Votes

Shamsudeen (Shamo)
In Polling Unit 1 – 143 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 158 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 300 Votes(Winner)

Invalid Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 15 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 7 Votes
Total No. of Invalid Votes – 22 Votes

Total Votes – 584 Votes

ASSISTANT SECRETARY-GENERAL
Muhammad (Police)
In Polling Unit 1 – 118 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 133 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 251 Votes

Dan Yazid
In Polling Unit 1 – 151 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 153 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 304 Votes(Winner)

Invalid Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 17 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 12 Votes
Total No. of Invalid Votes – 29 Votes

Total Votes – 584 Votes

SECRETARY-GENERAL
Abdulsamad Muhammad (Senegalese)
In Polling Unit 1 – 134 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 137 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 271 Votes

Muhammad Ammar
In Polling Unit 1 – 133 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 149 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 282 Votes ( Winner)

Invalid Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 19 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 12 Votes
Total No. of Invalid Votes – 31 Votes

Total Votes – 584 Votes

VICE-PRESIDENT
Halima Yusuf (Hamlal)
In Polling Unit 1 – 118 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 144 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 262 Votes

Khadija (Smally)
In Polling Unit 1 – 157 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 147 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 304 Votes Winner

Invalid Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 11 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 7 Votes
Total No. of Invalid Votes – 18 Votes

Total Votes – 584 Votes

PRESIDENT

Abdullahi Faruk (Sir Mutum)
In Polling Unit 1 – 177 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 163 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 340 Votes (Winner)

Abubakar (NEPA)
In Polling Unit 1 – 106 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 130 Votes
Total Number of Votes – 236 Votes

Invalid Votes
In Polling Unit 1 – 3 Votes
In Polling Unit 2 – 5 Votes
Total No. of Invalid Votes – 8 Votes

Total Votes – 584 Votes

In all honesty, the election was free and fair. The CTC/ELCOM performed their duty to their best capability with all sense of professionalism which is laudable.

While not forgetting the observers groups under the aegis of Student Union Bar, BUK Campus led by the duo of Hassan Musa Jeni (The immediate former Attorney General of LAWSAN BUK) and Yusuf Olalekan Emiola (The President of the Student Union Bar, BUK) and other members of the team.

They did a good job as the statistics and data above were provided by them under the purview of Adebayo Mubarak after being scrutinized and checked by the members.

Categories
Law

Chambers in Faculty of Law, BUK conduct congresses as Akanbi Yusuf, Lawal Habib, Hauwa Ahmad, Kamaldeen Muhammad emerges as new Chamber Heads.

Chambers conduct congresses as Akanbi Yusuf, Lawal Habib, Hauwa Ahmad, Kamaldeen Muhammad emerges as new Chamber Heads.

In the past few weeks, the faculty experienced a change in leadership across all the chambers and associations, the first was the Al Maslaha Chambers where Habib Lawal Olayinka was appointed as the new Mufti of Al Maslaha Chambers taking over from Mallam Maihakuri, the former head of the chambers.

Equity Chambers also elected its new exceutives which saw Yusuf Akanbi emerge as the Principal Partner taking over from AbdulBasit Shuaib, the former head of the chambers.

Liberty chambers also held its congress which led to the dissolution of the 2019/2020/2021 excos and the election of the new executives which saw Hauwa Ahmad Muhammad as the new Executive Director of the chambers.

Solace Chambers also held its congress which led to the dissolution of the 2019/2020/2021 excos and the election of the new executives which saw Kamaldeen Muhammad as the new Attorney General of the chambers.

The Law Clinic also experienced a change of leadership as Yusuf Emiola emerged as the Director General, Law Clinic succeeding the indefatigable Sulaiman Abdullahi.

Categories
Law

BUK TAX CLUB HOLDS GROUNDBREAKING INAUGRAL LECTURE.

The Tax day was organized by the department of private and commercial law together with the tax club Bayero University Kano. The event was organized to groom a generation of tax experts among the future legal practitioners, accountants, economics and business students.

During the event, there was the launching of Tax Club, Bayero University Kano, a professional students platform under which all tax and revenue related activities will be taking place. Among the guest speakers are Prof. Emmanuel Oyedokun who spoke on Young Lawyers/Youths and Career in Taxation.


Prof Emmanuel Oyedokun, holds three Phds, He is also a chartered accountant and taxation expert and also a member of the governing council of the CITN, he teaches in the Lead City University, Babcock, McPherson and coal city university.


Dr. Ahmad Aliyu Saka, Esq. a lecturer with University of Abuja, member chartered institute of taxation of Nigeria, chartered institute of Loan and risk management among others, he is the secretary of the Tax appeal tribunal, Abuja. Dr. Saka spoke on the
Dispute Resolution of Tax Matters in Nigeria: The Place of Young Lawyers. Among the guests, are; the chairman Federal inland revenue service, Kano, Chairman Kano state internal revenue service, Director of legal services federal inland revenue service, Kano, Kano district chairman of CITN, A representative of the ministry of finance Kano state, Prof. Muhammad of the department of accounting Bayero University, Kano, The dean of law represented by the deputy dean of law Dr. Nuhu Musa Idris.

The programme which was graced by many dignitaries was held in Faculty of Law, BUK.

Speaking about the tax club, Prof. Oyedekun as well as Kano CITN District chairman said that Tax club Bayero University,Kano is the third club, and first of its kind in the whole northern Nigeria apart from the one of Unilorin and they promise to work with the Tax club bayero university, Kano.
While making his remark, The President, Tax Club Bayero University Kano, Muhammad Abubakar Kumo assures all the club members as well as the stakeholders that the club will work hard and promised to live up to their expectation, he thanked all the stakeholders that graced the event and well as Prof. AB Ahmad whose idea gave birth to both the programme and the Club.

Categories
Law

RAPE IN BOYFRIEND/GIRLFRIEND RELATIONSHIP, RAPE IN MARRIAGE, CONSENT AND MISCONCEPTION OF CONSENT by Badmus Uthman O.

MY COLUMN.

TOPIC: RAPE IN BOYFRIEND/GIRLFRIEND RELATIONSHIP, RAPE IN MARRIAGE, CONSET AND MISCONCEPTION OF CONSENT BY BADMUS UTHMAN O.

INTRODUCTORY PART.

Rape is a criminal offence under the Nigerian law, which is statutorily defined, and encapsulated with it elements under section 282 (1) of the penal code, and section 357 of the criminal code.

Rape is simply defined as intentional sexual intercourse with a girl or woman without her consent. The offence of rape against a person will not stand if there is agreement, and when full consent is obtained from a girl or woman by a man or boy to have intercourse with her. And to the extent of it expressions, the two sections provide for it elements  as follows ;

(1) Against her will
(2) Without her consent,
(3) With her consent but obtained by force or intimidation or by deception,
(4) With or without her consent but underage, I.e under the age of 14 or of unsound mind, and
(5) With her consent but under false representation. “A situation where he makes the woman to believe that he is her husband .

The main objective of the law is to regulate every activity of human beings in general, and to provide limitations, protections and also obligations for each aspect of human life. However, despite it struggle to capture every aspect, there are still some area where the provisions of the law is silent. Citing a case of study, the relationship which is commonly referred to as “girlfriend/boyfriend”, concubinage, and courtship are within the blind spot of the law and this eventually leaves these relationships unrecognized, uncovered, and unprotected by the law.

CAN A MAN OR BOY RAPE HIS GIRLFRIEND?, AND ALSO CAN RAPE OCCUR IN A LEGAL MARRIAGE?. EITHER CUSTOMARY OR STATUTORY MARRIAGE.

The first issue for determination is to determine whether or not there is a circumstance(s) where a boy or man can be found guilty of the offence of rape if he has carnal knowledge of his girlfriend, concubinage or courtship without her consent, by deception or by force. Despite being that they are both in a romantic relationship, whether publicly known or otherwise.

As cited and stated earlier in the fourth paragraph of this piece, the said relationships which were referred to as (boyfriend/girlfriend, concubinage or courtship) are not recognized by the law and every activity conducted under it is not guided by the law as well. By this so, a boyfriend doesn’t in anyway or manner under the authority of the existing Nigerian law(s) has any right over his girlfriend to give consent to sexual intercourse whether for once or all the time, this simply implies that any form of consent that may come to effectiveness in these relationships must always be discretional, it simply implies that the girl or woman in question must give consent willingly.

Furtherance, a girlfriend can neither be taken for granted nor could her consent be assumed or dispensed, just because of a mere fact that the girl or woman is a girlfriend or in a courtship with a boy or man.

The position of the law is clear, precise and concise as regards to this legal matter, the provision of the law is that, a charge of the offence of rape against an alleged boyfriend will sustain, and stand if he has carnal knowledge (sex) of his girlfriend “without her consent, against her will, by force or deception, and with consent but the girl in question is under-age”. Regardless of whether they are both in a mutual relationship or not.

In the case of  “THE STATE V IDOWU YESUFU (1979) 1 FNLR 174.”  the court held that  “THE RELATIONSHIP COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS “GIRLFRIEND/BOYFRIEND” OR CONCUBINAGE OR COURTSHIP OF A WOMAN BY A MAN DOES NOT IN LAW CONFER A RIGHT ON THE MAN TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH THE WOMAN…”,.

The honourable court further stated that”…THE WOMAN (Girlfriend) CANNOT BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED NOR COULD HER CONSENT BE ASSUMED OR BE DISPENSED WITH , IF THE MAN HAS TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH HER. This further clearly stated that an offence of rape will substantiate against a boyfriend if he has sexual intercourse with his girlfriend without considering her consent or take her consent for granted.

However, as to whether or not a husband can rape his legally married wife.

Simply, any form of sexual intercourse between a husband and his wife cannot in any form constitute the offence of rape, because marriage itself is consent to sexual intercourse.

This assertion received a judicial blessing in the case of R v Miller (1954) 2 QB 282 where the court held that “THAT THE APPELLANT COULD NOT BE GUILTY OF RAPE, AS THE IMPLIED CONSENT OF A WIFE TO HAVE INTERCOURSE WITH HER HUSBAND COULD ONLY BE REVOKED BY COURT ORDER OR A BINDING SEPARATION AGREEMENT. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THIS CONSENT HAD NOT BEEN REVOKED. NEVERTHELESS, A HUSBAND WAS NOT ENTITLED TO USE FORCE OR VIOLENCE FOR THE PURPOSES OF EXERCISING HIS RIGHT TO INTERCOURSE; TO DO SO WOULD AMOUNT TO AN ASSAULT.

The Honourable court has  made it clear that “Use of force by a man to exercise his right to intercourse, would only amount to assault and not to rape.

MISCONCEPTION OF CONSENT,  VITATION OF CONSENT AND WHEN IS CONSENT NOT VITATED.

In addition, if eventually a girlfriend doesn’t actually give consent, but the boyfriend mistaken that she consented, he would be excused FROM criminal liability. Meanwhile, the evidential liability will be solely rested on him (that he must show, and satisfactorily prove that there was actually a mistake). however, it will be very difficult to prove that there was actually misconception considering the combined effect of section 37 and 39 of the penal code. By virtue of these two sections, consent will be invalidated if it is obtained without due care and attention, and if consent is given for fear of being injured, misconception of fact, and when the girl doesn’t understand the nature of what she give consent to or by a person who is under fourteen years of age.

More so, the law has made a vivid, clear, otherwise obvious distinction between submission, and consent. Although every consent involves submission, but a mere submission is not consent because a victim might submit herself in fear of the use of force on her, or being harm as the case maybe. See also (R v. Olugboja (1982) QB 320.

Nevertheless, it is not rape, and consent is not vitated if the lady understands the nature of the act, but only expected that she would be paid, since she is aware of the nature of the act and her consent wasn’t obtained through force or intimidation but only that the man or boy refused to pay for the service rendered. Then, it is not rape. Moreso, the offence of rape cannot surface or stand if the man promise her gifts, and later renounce it. See also R v. Linekar (1995) 3 ALL ER 69.

Consequently, consent would be generally vitiated if a guy induce a girl with alcohol, or any other intoxicating substance to such an extent that the girl is unable to give informed consent. Informed consent in the sense that, the girl or woman must be aware of the nature of the act, and  she must be in her right senses. See also R v. Wood (1982) 74 Cr App R 312.

Lastly, sexual intercourse between a man or boy and woman or girl engaging in a romantic relationship is a necessity, the law is not trying to regulate this mutual activity.

However, the provisions of the law is very strict about consent, because the right of the other gender must also be protected as their consent to this activity is mostly taken for granted, dispensed and obtained under undue care. Also, by virtue of the existing law, an underage girl does not have the ability to give consent to intercourse whether or not she is in a romantic relationship with a boy or man.

REFERENCES;
SECTION 282 (1) OF THE PENAL CODE.
SECTION 357 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.
SECTION 37 AND 39 OF THE PENAL CODE.
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF NIGERIAN CRIMINAL LAW, BY ESA O. ONOJA.
THE STATE V IDOWU YESUFU (1979) 1 FNLR 174.
R V MILLER (1954) 2 QB 282.
R V OLUGBOJA (1982) QB 320.
R v. LINEAR (1995) 3 ALL ER 69.
R v. WOOD (1982) 74 CR APP R 312.

Categories
Law

THE STORY BEHIND THE CASE OF NAFIU RABIU V THE STATE. A MUST READ!

On Wednesday, May 9, 1979, Nafiu Isyaku Rabiu and his beautiful wife Fatima hosted his three friends to a dinner in the verdant garden of his Dawaki Road, Kano residence. After the sumptuous feast, toasts and clinking glasses, the friends left the “happy” couple “quite alright” at around 11pm.


The following day, Kano awoke to the most celebrated murder case in history. The story was that Nafiu Rabiu, the prima donna of Kano socialites and oldest son of a rich Kano cleric, Sheikh Isyaku Rabiu, had murdered his wife, Fatima. Nafiu Rabiu was in those days notorious for alleged methomania, reckless driving, vanity and hedonistic lifestyle.
In the public court, Nafiu Rabiu was pronounced guilty of killing his wife by pushing her down stairs.

According to some accounts, the then governor of Kano State, Muhammadu Abubakar Rimi, took a vow to send Nafiu Rabiu to the gallows, just as Fatima’s millionaire dad, Tijjani Aliyu Dagazau, undertook to ensure justice for her at all costs.
But to the chagrin of the state, the family of the deceased and the people of Kano who trooped to “Kotun Nafiu” on Court Road, Kano to witness the proceedings, the Supreme Court on November 21, 1980 (exactly 37 years ago yesterday) dismissed the appeal of Kano State government.
In their testimonies, Nafiu Rabiu’s cook and driver gave the account of what transpired in the house on May 10, 1979. The cook said he came to the house in the morning and strangely found the door locked, and when he asked his colleague (the driver), who normally kept the keys to the main building, for the key, he told him was not given the key.

After waiting for a couple of hours, Nafiu Rabiu opened the window and threw the keys to the driver. At 10am,

Nafiu Rabiu re-appeared and asked his cook to open the kitchen door as he had misplaced the keys to the front door. Nafiu later came out holding “soiled blankets and clothes” and asked his driver to put them into the boot of his Peugeot 504. Nafiu then asked the driver to pick his mother in-law in his other car, a Mercedes-Benz saloon, from Kano airport. According to Nafiu’s account, the mother-in-law was due to arrive from Niamey that day.
Nafiu later drove out in his Peugeot 504 and instructed his cook to serve his wife (who according to Nafiu Rabiu’s account was asleep when he left the house) when she woke up. For the first time, Nafiu left the keys to the door leading from the kitchen to the lounge and other parts of the main house with the cook.


Later in the noon, their children (who apparently slept the previous night elsewhere) were driven to the house. With the keys left, the cook opened the inner lounge leading the room to the children. They found their mother dead.

Those who saw Fatima’s body suspected foul play after noticing injuries and signs of strangulation. The state took up the matter, hiring top pathologists to conduct autopsy on her body. The team of the four pathologists who conducted the post-mortem examination was led by Dr. Bansi Badan Tribedi, a senior Consultant Pathologist working as pathologist since 1948 in Calcutta, United Kingdom and Ghana for 14years, and in Nigeria for seven years.

But despite state resources, public interest, the influence of Fatima’s father, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Fatima had died as a result of strangulation that led to asphyxia.

Source: DailyNigeria


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started